Ownership Sums

Congratulations to Maca, who's just bought himself some digs. Fair dues to him, and I mean that. But never let me pass over an opportunity to poo on someone's parade. So here goes...

Maca says that they bought the house because "we figure we’re better off paying our mortgage than someone else’s mortgage." Is this true in the present climate? Is the property ladder the place to be when it's really a snake?

The way I figure it, putting aside all those intangible joys like trips to Ikea etc, the 'am I better off paying my own mortgage?' calculation ought to proceed according to the maxim that the fall in property prices minus the amount paid off the principal on the mortgage ought not be greater than the outlay in rent (by the way, I had this expressed in an equation a couple of minutes ago but decided that I'd never be invited to dinner parties again if I posted it. Truly I am a sad, sad person).

So, if the amount you spend on your rent is more than a fall in value of your house minus the amount you pay onto the principal on the mortgage then buy. If not, then rent. Or, to take an example: in the first year of a mortgage, assuming an average priced €300,000 house at 5.4% APR, you will only pay about €4,200 off the principal (and €16,000 odd in interest). In that time in 2008, the house will have fallen in value by €24,000 (about 8% according to Goodbody). So the purchase of a house is worthwhile if you would otherwise fork out €19,600 in rent in the year. That's €1,633 a month. Of course, you could buy a cheaper house. It's also not unlikely, if you are renting a house, that this calculation might work in favour of buying (well, that or renting somewhere smaller). On the other hand, you could be saddled with a higher interest rate on your mortgage than I've allowed for here. Either way, what is undoubtedly true is that part of the value of the house will simply disappear into thin air in 2008/9. And lots of the mortgage will go toward the upkeep of the bank's shareholders, not towards the principal on the loan.

In which case it's not unlikely that renting until prices bottom out would be better overall than paying one's own mortgage. Let someone else suffer the loss in wealth and then jump onto the ladder. Or at least that it's not automatically the case that you are better off paying your own mortgage from 2008 than you would be leaving it until 2010.

Comments

Hugh Green:

You might also need to factor in at some stage the fundamental meaninglessness of future house prices to people who decide to buy themselves a certain house because they figure they want to live in that house for the rest of their days and will have no need to move anywhere else, or 'unlock equity' on their dwelling to buy another house or a speedboat or whatever.

Ciarán:

Well I'm entirely a fan of the buying houses to live in them philosophy (as I've said before, the 'unlock equity' craze combined with state collusion is what has landed us all in this fine mess in the first place), so I agree with you. But Maca's notion that you're better off paying your own mortgage than someone else's doesn't necessarily hold during a slump in house prices prices. The aspiration to make a home will still be there in a couple of years time. By then, however, it will be much cheaper to do so and you have handed as much of your wealth over to the bank.

Hugh Green:

Oh, yeah, I agree that, in so far as we're talking about houses in general, you're better off waiting. But there may be a particular object of desire -I don't know, a house next to your mother-in-law- which won't be around in a couple of years' time, for which you might be prepared to pay a premium. Perhaps such circumstances are rare.

Ciarán:

I totally agree: there are other reasons for buying now that count for a lot no matter what's happening to house prices.

And I certainly don't want to bitch at Maca about this: as you say there are lots of reasons for buying houses at any time - the joys of ownership, the deepening of relationships, the opportunity to not tell any recently-made nemesis your new address - but it comes at a price.

I supposed what irked me about Maca's post was the echo of generations of Irish people bowing at the altar of home ownership. Ending up effectively owing the bank more than when you started is no fun (even if I'm just a bit glad that lots of people who priced others out of the market with their speculations are suffering the consequences), no matter what cultural refrains are bounced around.

Nick:

Also don't forget the actual cost of moving - conveyancing, mortgage arrangement fee, survey, ?removal van, ?estate agent, ?stamp duty, outstanding repairs etc. That can add thousands of pounds to the cost.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <sup> <b> <u> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options