July, 2007

Red Messengers

Three fine, if inconsequential in the greater scheme of things, discoveries in the last 24 hours:

1) There's a cycle messengers' world championship and this year it's in Dublin.

2) Comments captchas can be put to good use. ReCaptcha creates Captchas for your site by sending words that the Internet Archive book digitisation project can't decipher so you can read them and send your answer back. It's a sort of SETI for books. Who'd have thunk it?

3) The bloke that wrote The Red Flag came from the same village as my Grandmother.

I almost guarantee that you and your life was were less fragrant before you read this.

Circulation to the Brain

I'm not usually a fan of Johan Hari's writing, but his review of Nick Cohen's What's Left is absolutely excellent in pointing out what's so profoundly mistaken about the pro-war left.

Shoot

Ah well. Let's pretend that we're having a Summer. If there's no dry weather in the next few weeks I'd say the farmer will be in trouble.

More on Civic Unionism

As you can see, I posted on Wednesday last week on Chekist's post about civic unionism. This provoked an interesting discussion, both here and on Three Thousand Versts... about what civic Unionism might entail. Anyway, I've been a bit lazy and have left two comments unanswered, one by O'Neill and one by Chekist himself.

I've started out writing a brief reply, but for distinctly Mark Twainian1 reasons, it turned into a 1500 word comment. Given that I think I raise some interesting, or at least mildly diverting, points, I think that it merits a post to itself. Basically, if you're too lazy/wise to read on, I tackle O'Neill's comment (with whom I agree on a lot) on the subject of trends in social conservatism north and south and I address Checkist's comment both on ethno-nationalist origins and on why a United Ireland used to be justified but isn't now.

 read the rest of this post »

and baby makes four

Today's Supreme Court Decision on a lesbian couple, their one year old child and the biological father of that child raises more questions than answers. In their appeal, the respondents sought to overturn the decision of the High Court Judge "...that the balancing exercise should be swung in favour of the child remaining in the jurisdiction, and within proximity of his father for the purpose of developing the relationship between father and child...."

The question is not one of guardianship because under Irish law, an unmarried father has no automatic guardianship rights, although these can be applied for. If the father was aware of this prior to donating his sperm and had any sort of expectation towards seeking guardianship, one would wonder why he decided to do so. One can only assume that this was an altruistic act which was not entirely thought through.

Equally, the decision of the couple to receive sperm from a friend may not have been made with sufficient foresight. A telling phrase in the judgment is that they anticipated that the role of the man towards the child would be that of a "favourite uncle" despite the fact that the child would know that this man was his father. How could this relationship be so clearly defined, at least in words, so early on when it was impossible to anticipate what feelings both man and child might develop towards each other over time? More fool them for thinking that that agreement was viable.

This case highlights the lack of clear legislation for the relatively large numbers of gay partners who decide to have a child but also for men who father children outside marriage in general.

A Bit Rich

By way of celebrating the Glorious 12th, what better than a display of virtuoso drumming...

Wicklow Train

There was a spectacularly snotgreen sea coming up from Wicklow at the start of the week. This pic is ruined a bit by reflections on the glass, but still it's a good reminder of why living by the coast seems like such a good option...

We the People

Chekist has had an interesting sequence (also here and here) on civic Unionism over on Three Thousand Verts of Loneliness that was picked up last month by United Irelander (with, for UI, a pretty interesting comments thread) and has timed its latest installment most appropriately for tonight. It's been an interesting series, probably more interesting than UI has allowed, but I do find it somewhat problematic.

On the specific level of the posts, I am suspicious of the robustness of the civic defence of Ulster Unionism.

 read the rest of this post »

if you were to go postal, how would you do it?

As I explained last night, I was beset by noisy teenagers on my way down to Dublin yesterday. But it didn't end there. We had an alarm going off all night in one of the flats above and are now being entertained by a bass-laden broadcast from another flat. Don't you just love city living?

My esteemed fellow-blogger has spotted me giggling and rolling my eyes and, fearing that the neighbours might end up wearing her bodhrán as an Elizabethan-style ruff (or maybe she is worried about my imaginative intentions towards her cipín), is taking me off to Wicklow for the weekend.

Adieu.

On the Other Foot

Well you learn something new every day! I hadn't really thought about it, but didn't realise that there was a controversy over why Ian Paisley left the Orange Order. I think I just presumed that he regarded the order as too soft, or too not-led-by-Paisley, for his tastes.

It seems, however, that this story is a source of some controversy. Cutting through the jibes, there's a fascinating conversation in a comments thread over on Slugger between Michael Shilliday and others as to the roots of the split.

By the way, I'd never actually thought of Orange Arches as being owned, which was a little naive of me. Interesting stuff.