guardian

Dec 16 13:01

Grand Surveys #1

There was a bizarre feature in yesterday's Guardian on political advertising in Iowa. Nothing particularly controversial about the content, but I was struck by the strange scientific claim behind the piece. The thrust was: Iowans are subject to lots of ads from caucus candidates. No shit. But wait: apparently the Guardian knows this because they "commissioned a survey of a local TV station and found that in one half-hour period eight political ads were aired."

Is it just me but doesn't that read a little bit like: "watched television for half an hour"?

It gets better though. There's a comment on the survey method at the bottom of (the online version of) the article: "Dean Treftz, a reporter with the Daily Iowan, campus paper at the University of Iowa, listed the advertisements broadcast over a 30-minute period on his local TV station." So the first passage, strictly speaking, out to read: "The Guardian got a student to watch TV for half an hour and he wrote down stuff that happened."

Also, the half hour coincided with the early evening news.

High level content analysis indeed.

Mar 07 18:48

Horseshit of History

Today is an historical day. Two sworn enemies put themselves up for election so that they can go into government together. It's as if Lord Sauron and Donkey were to become joint managers of the Republic of Ireland football team. It's, like, that historical.

Twaddle of course.

But not as bad as concocting a witless analogy with Israel and Palestine to help "convey the scale of the transformation now underway in Northern Ireland."