healthcare

Dec 11 20:58

St Luke's Hospital

Via Twenty Major, I see that St Luke's Cancer Hospital in Dublin is set to close, with services being moved to a radiotherapy centre in the enormous St. James's hospital closer to the city centre. It's a sad thing to see a hospital closed. In my experience it's a common phenomenon that cancer centres are regarded with a seemingly strange level of affection on the part of patients and their families. This, I guess, is largely down to the incredible people in oncology departments who not only administer the technologies of medicine but the massive emotional impact that cancer can have on patients' families (often, in fact, the impact is greater for families than for the patient themselves).

Still, all that said, I think that the move to centralise cancer services is probably the one bright element in the monumental, world-historical, fuck-up that is Irish cancer care (see here, also via Twenty Major, for one example of how bad things are).

Cancer services are best provided in a centralised manner for two reasons. First, oncology is very very expensive (and set to get more so), so it's simply easier and more effective to pool resources than it is to have a radiology machine here and another one there etc. And it's better to have lots of experts in one place than to have them either dotted around the country or (as also happens) driving from hospital to hospital. Second, and I don't think people consider this very often, people with cancer tend to end up needing all sorts of other services - CT scans, dermatologists, pain management, kidney stuff and so on. If you don't have the resident expert or technology at your own small hospital, you're going to have to bundled at great discomfort and expense into an ambulance to be ferried to the scan or whatever. That is just not a good thing.

Given all this, while the Irish health services is an almost criminal disaster from end to end, I just can't bring myself to feel regret at the concentration of cancer services in Ireland. It's sad that St. Lukes will close, but it will probably make the lives of cancer patients (those who have got in the door anyway) just a little bit easier and, perhaps, a little bit longer.

Jul 03 23:17

Unlimited Demand

As I said before, I miss Frank McGahon's blogging presence. We saw eye-to-eye on enough things to make arguing over the many things we certainly don't agree on very interesting indeed! Anyway, following a statcounter link last week, I discovered that Frank had moved to occasional blogging on a group enterprise called Distributed Republic. And what a good site it is too. Very libertarian, but in a way that a liberal (in the American sense) like myself can really get my teeth into.

Anyway, I inadvertently started a row over there this afternoon in response to this post, which is really a lifting of a rather silly (to my mind) critique of Michael Moore's Sicko. I haven't seen Sicko, but I do take issue with someone, as the commentator did, suggesting that 'When governments attempt to regulate the balance between a limited supply of health care and an unlimited demand for it they're inevitably forced to ration treatment.' Where to start with this nonsense I don't know. I chose to object to the idea that there is a potential for unlimited demand for healthcare, which irks the pedant in me, though I could just as easily narked that markets also ration treatment. They just use price as the mechanism for deciding how treatment ought to be rationed. I prefer a system that uses illness (say, as defined by a triage nurse) as a mechanism for distribution.

Anyway, I wrote a rather tetchy comment and to my surprise provoked a load of responses. To which I responded in turn.

As I write my very long response is in a moderation queue and I don't know if it deserves to come out the other end, but I think the thread is interesting enough already. And if my post does turn up, I'm sure that by the time I wake up tomorrow I'll have been bollocked to high heaven by my interlocutors.

Is it terminally geeky to think that good non-flamey online rows are fun?