philosophy

Jun 30 12:02

Straw Babies

It seems that the two-way straw men of the stem cell debate are alive and well on the Irish Times letters page. Keith Lockitch, who seems to be a postdoc at the Ayn Rand Institute, wrote a letter the contents of which I'm guessing are pretty much here. He leaves a marvellous hostage to fortune in claiming that the embryo is not quite human.

 read the rest of this post »

Jun 10 14:50

Rorty's Death

I am so sorry to hear, via Crooked Timber, that Richard Rorty died two days ago. Although I have never discussed Rorty's ideas in publishable work I did write a chapter on him in my PhD thesis (which counts, at best, as juvenilia) and have always wanted to draw out some ideas on him. I might do yet of course, but - and this is a rare thing to say - I'll miss reading new work by him.

All of which is a bit strange to say because the different things that I write are almost entirely removed from the things that Rorty was interested in. Nonetheless, he was an intriguing and unfairly overlooked figure in academic philosophy. And his deceptively easy prose made him about the most challenging figure to teach in contemporary political philosophy (something I'm not sure I ever did well) in that students were generally persuaded by him but hadn't accounted for the nuances of what he had to say. Which is a roundabout way of saying that I didn't quite get him...

Rorty had a huge number of strings to his bow,1 including an excellent essay on prospects for the American left (he was, as the wonderful term goes, raised a red diaper baby), but his primary focus as an academic was on what it is that philosophy does.

 read the rest of this post »

Apr 12 21:25

Civitas Sibi Princeps...

...is the upshot of Pettit's paper. His Powerpoint presentation is available on Trinity College's Philosophy Department's website (pdf).

Excellent lecture, very interesting. As with all the brilliant philosophers I've heard speak, Pettit is a spectacularly clear speaker. Leif Wenar's response was also engrossing. I'll type my notes up at some stage then might comment at great length. In the meanwhile, while I think that the Powerpoint was clear enough to get a sense of what Pettit was on about, at a first glance this paper (pdf) might also explain some of the issues.

The title, by the way, comes from the Jurist Bartolo de Sassoferrato. 12th Century Perugia, a city republic, was at risk from the arbitrary rule of the Holy Roman Emperor. The Emperor, it was felt, could not intervene where local princes reigned, on the convention that the prince was entirely sovereign in his own lands. Since republics didn't have princes, though, the Emperor had - on occasion - taken it upon himself to ravage them on the grounds that, since there was no sovereign and he was the über-sovereign, he could do what he liked. Describing how this might break the conventions and laws of Italy at the time was an urgent concern for Perugia's jurists.

Anyway, it was Bartolo who came up with the lovely formulation that, in Perugia, the citizenry was the prince.

I'm sure Hobbes read Bartolo too, but the traces through that are for another day...

Apr 12 09:10

Pettit in Trinity

I'm off to see Philip Pettit's inaugural Edmund Burke lecture in Trinity College Dublin at 18:00 this evening. He'll be speaking on "Democracy: Fashions, Failures and Fantasies." I might be wrong, but the title suggests he'll be making a comment or two on the failures and fallacies of democracy-by-invasion.

Pettit is best known in my sort of crowd for his philosophical work on republicanism (in the proper sense, not that expressed by most of the commenters on Slugger), but I've read more of his work on groups, responsibility and the discursive dilemma.

 read the rest of this post »

Jan 09 11:24

From the Chorus

Via Hugh Green, there's a great article by Corey Robin on Hannah Arendt in the current London Review of Books.