Thanks to Pete Baker for synopsising the results of the research (pdf) on the motivations of no voters in the Lisbon referendum. If the research is sound, it seems that 42% of no voters and 48% of abstentions were motivated by a feeling of ignorance about the treaty. Now, this has motivated some bizarre commentary on Slugger, with some twat arguing that the complexity of the treaty was itself a plot by 'the EU' to baboozle voters into a yes vote (a wonderful mix of paranoia and Irish narcisism there).
Now, I'm exposing myself to accusations sour grapes, since I advocated a yes vote, butI would have thought that voting no or abstaining because the treaty is too complex is not somehow a vote against complex law or something (consolidated laws, which is what Lisbon largely is, tend to be very very complex). Are the electorate really sending a message that law should be simpler?
Voting no or abstaining because of ignorance is voting against being asked (at least in the one-off referendum). So we should either stop asking and leave it to the professionals or should ask in a very different way. read the rest of this post »
Recent comments
4 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
5 weeks 1 day ago
5 weeks 2 days ago
9 weeks 2 hours ago
9 weeks 4 days ago
10 weeks 6 days ago
11 weeks 5 days ago